Select Page

Assessment #4 Instructions: Stakeholder Presentation.For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter.You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.Demonstration of ProficiencyCompetency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health. Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes. Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team. Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional, respectful manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.Professional ContextThis assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.ScenarioIn addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA. When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.InstructionsPlease follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?Why should the audience care about solving it?Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.What is the objective?How likely is it to work?What will the interdisciplinary team do?Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?Part 5: Evaluation.What would a successful outcome of the project look like?What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success? How could this be used to show the degree of success?Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.Additional RequirementsNumber of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.SCORING GUIDEUse the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.
scoring_guide_and_resources_4.docx

effectiveppt.pptx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Stakeholder Presentation Scoring Guide
NONPERFORMANC
E
BASIC
PROFICIENT
Explain an
organizational
or patient
issue for
which a
collaborative
interdisciplina
ry team
approach
would help
achieve a
specific
improvement
goal.
Does not
describe an
organizational
or patient
issue for
which a
collaborative
interdisciplina
ry team
approach
would help
achieve a
specific
improvement
goal.
Describes an
organizational
or patient
issue but the
way in which
a collaborative
interdisciplina
ry team
approach
would help
achieve a
specific
improvement
goal is unclear
or missing.
Explains an
organizational
or patient
issue for
which a
collaborative
interdisciplina
ry team
approach
would help
achieve a
specific
improvement
goal.
Explains an
organizational
or patient issue
for which a
collaborative
interdisciplinar
y team
approach
would help
achieve a
specific
improvement
goal, noting
potential
consequences
of not
addressing the
issue.
Summarize an
evidencebased
interdisciplina
ry plan to
address an
organizational
or patient
issue.
Does not
summarize an
evidencebased
interdisciplina
ry plan to
address an
organizational
or patient
issue.
Discusses an
evidencebased
interdisciplina
ry plan, but its
relevance to
an
organizational
or patient
issue is
unclear.
Summarizes
an evidencebased
interdisciplina
ry plan to
address an
organizational
or patient
issue.
Summarizes an
evidence-based
interdisciplinar
y plan to
address an
organizational
or patient issue,
noting specific
sources of
evidence used
to develop the
plan.
Explain how
the
interdisciplina
ry plan could
be
implemented
Does not
explain how
the
interdisciplina
ry plan could
be
implemented
Explains how
the
interdisciplina
ry plan could
be
implemented
or how the
Explains how
the
interdisciplina
ry plan could
be
implemented
and how the
Explains how
the
interdisciplinar
y plan could be
implemented
and how the
human and
CRITERIA
DISTINGUISHE
D
CRITERIA
NONPERFORMANC
E
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHE
D
and how the
human and
financial
resources
would be
managed.
and how the
human and
financial
resources
would be
managed.
human and
financial
resources
would be
managed, but
not both.
human and
financial
resources
would be
managed.
financial
resources
would be
managed,
providing realworld
examples
relevant to the
context of the
health care
organization.
Propose
evidencebased criteria
to evaluate the
degree to
which the
project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement
goal.
Does not
propose
evidencebased criteria
to evaluate the
degree to
which the
project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement
goal.
Proposes
irrelevant
criteria or
criteria not
based in
evidence to
evaluate the
degree to
which the
project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement
goal.
Proposes
evidencebased criteria
to evaluate the
degree to
which the
project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement
goal.
Proposes
evidence-based
criteria to
evaluate the
degree to
which the
project was
successful in
achieving the
improvement
goal, noting
specific
sources of
evidence used
to develop the
criteria.
Communicate
the
PowerPoint
presentation
of the
interdisciplina
ry
improvement
plan to
stakeholders
Does not
communicate
the
PowerPoint
presentation of
the
interdisciplina
ry
improvement
plan to
stakeholders in
a professional,
Communicate
s the
PowerPoint
presentation
of the
interdisciplina
ry
improvement
plan to
stakeholders
but the writing
is unclear,
Communicate
s the
PowerPoint
presentation
of the
interdisciplina
ry
improvement
plan to
stakeholders
in a
professional,
Communicates
the PowerPoint
presentation of
the
interdisciplinar
y improvement
plan to
stakeholders in
a professional,
respectful
manner, with
writing that is
CRITERIA
in a
professional,
respectful
manner, with
writing that is
clear, logically
organized,
with correct
grammar and
spelling, using
current APA
style.
NONPERFORMANC
E
respectful
manner, with
writing that is
clear, logically
organized,
with correct
grammar and
spelling, using
current APA
style.
BASIC
poorly
organized,
and/or
contains
numerous
errors in
grammar or
APA style.
Resources:

Leadership

Grindel, C. G. (2016). Clinical leadership: A call to
action. Medsurg Nursing, 25(1), 9–16.
This article discusses the characteristics—and
importance—of nurses who exhibit clinical
leadership.
Morrison, J. (2016). Nursing leadership in ACO
payment reform. Nursing Economic$, 34(5), 230–
235.
The effects of health care finance reform on nursing
leadership are explored in this paper.
o

o


Advocacy and Policy
American Nurses Association.
(n.d.). Advocacy. Retrieved from
PROFICIENT
respectful
manner, with
writing that is
clear, logically
organized,
with correct
grammar and
spelling, using
current APA
style.
DISTINGUISHE
D
clear, logically
organized, with
correct
grammar and
spelling, using
current APA
style with no
errors.
o

o

o

o


o
https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/advocacy/
This Web page provides resources and tools to
help nurses become competent advocates.
American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Health
policy. Retrieved from
https://www.nursingworld.org/practicepolicy/health-policy/
This Web page provides links to statements and
resources for various health policies relevant to
nursing.
Arms, D., & Stalter, A. M. (2016). Serving on
organizational boards: What nurses need to
know. Online Journal of Issues in
Nursing, 21(2), D1–D9.
This article relates an overview of
competencies needed by nurses that are
developing policy or serving on organizational
boards.
Olson, K. (2016). Influence through policy:
Four steps YOU can take. Reflections on
Nursing Leadership, 42(2), 1–3. Retrieved from
https://www.reflectionsonnursingleadership.org
/commentary/morecommentary/Vol42_2_influence-throughpolicy-four-steps-you-can-take
This article presents practical steps that nurses
can take to develop and influence the direction
of health policies.
Financial Resources
Welton, J. M., & Harper, E. M. (2015). Nursing
care value-based financial models. Nursing
Economics, 33(1), 14–19, 25.
This article reviews value-based financial
models and their potential applications to
nursing care.
Human Resources

o


o


o

Annis, A. M., Robinson, C. H., Yankey, N.,
Krein, S. L., Duffy, S. A., Taylor, B., & Sales,
A. (2017). Factors associated with the
implementation of a nurse staffing
directive. JONA: The Journal of Nursing
Administration, 47(12), 636–644.
This article may be helpful as you address
human resources management in your
presentation.
Evidence-Based Practice
American Journal of Nursing. (n.d.). AJN’s
Evidence-based practice series: Step by
step. Retrieved from
https://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedp
racticenetwork/home/toolsresources/collections/ajn-ebp-series.aspx
This Web page presents resources, articles, and
knowledge checks that may be useful to you as
you create your presentation or when reviewing
EBP concepts.
Capella Writing Center
Introduction to the Writing Center.
Use the Capella Writing Center to help you
better understand and improve your writing.
APA Style and Format
Refer to the Writing Center’s APA Module for
tips on proper use of APA style and format.
Capella University Library

o

o
BSN Program Library Research Guide.
The library research guide will be useful in
guiding you through the Capella University
Library, offering tips for searching the literature
and other references for your assessments.
PowerPoint
Capella University Library: PowerPoint
Presentations.
This library guide contains links to Microsoft’s
PowerPoint Help pages and other useful
resources.
Guidelines for Effective
PowerPoint Presentations
Introduction
One concern about visual presentations is that the technology
used to create them can be used in such a way that it actually
detracts from the message rather than enhances it. To help
you consider carefully how your message is presented so that
it reflects care, quality, and professionalism, consider the
information provided in the remaining slides.
NOTE: This presentation serves as an example in itself, by
utilizing all of the guidelines mentioned.
Outline
The following topics will be covered:
▪ Writing
▪ Bullets
▪ Organization
▪ Tables
▪ Audience
▪ Font
▪ Design
▪ Speaker Notes
▪ Images
Writing
▪ Present ideas succinctly with lean prose.
▪ Use short sentences.
▪ Use active, rather than passive voice.
▪ Avoid negative statements, if possible.
▪ Avoid double negative entirely.
▪ Check spelling and grammar.
▪ Use consistent capitalization rules.
Organization
▪ Develop a clear, strategic introduction to provide context
for the presentation.
▪ Develop an agenda or outline slide to provide a roadmap
for the presentation.
▪ Group relevant pieces of information together.
▪ Integrate legends and keys with charts and tables.
▪ Organize slides in logical order.
▪ Present one concept or idea per slide.
▪ Use only one conclusion slide to recap main ideas.
Audience
▪ Present information at language level of intended audience.
▪ Do not use jargon or field-specific language.
▪ Follow the 70% rule—If it does not apply to 70% of your
audience, present it to individuals at a different time.
Design
▪ Use a consistent design throughout the presentation.
▪ Keep layout and other features consistent.
▪ Use the master slide design feature to ensure consistency.
▪ Use consistent horizontal and vertical alignment of slide
elements throughout the presentation.
▪ Leave ample space around images and text.
Images
▪ When applicable, enhance text-only slide content by
developing relevant images for your presentation.
▪ Do not use gratuitous graphics on each slide.
▪ Use animations only when needed to enhance meaning. If
selected, use them sparingly and consistently.
Bullets
▪ Use bullets unless showing rank or sequence of items.
▪ If possible, use no more than five bullet points and eight
lines of text total per slide.
Tables
▪ Use simple tables to show numbers, with no more than 4
rows x 4 columns.
▪ Reserve more detailed tables for a written summary.
Font
▪ Keep font size at 24 point or above for slide titles.
▪ Keep font size at 18 or above for headings and explanatory
text.
▪ Use sans serif fonts such as Arial or Verdana.
▪ Use ample contrast between backgrounds and text.
Speaker Notes
▪ Summarize key information.
▪ Provide explanation.
▪ Discuss application and implication to the field, discipline or
work setting.
▪ Document the narration you would use with each slide.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment