Select Page

PLEASE UPLOAD ON SEPARATE WORD DOCUMENTS WITH TURNITIN REPORTSTASK 1:For this milestone assignment, you will provide an initial self-reflection that discusses your own strengths as well as areas you feel you may need to improve. You will consider how these aspects of your personality and self-concept will allow you to improve your skills in a future leadership role.SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FULL INSTRUCTIONSTASK 2:Overview: This journal is private between you and the instructor.
This week, you learned about active reading and analysis by looking more closely at a selected reading. In doing so, you uncovered ideas in the “Turning Off,
Dining In” article that may have been difficult to identify during your literal reading of the text. To prepare for this assignment, please reread your selected article and your notes from Module One. Then, in a Microsoft Word document, answer the following
questions:  Discuss the context of your selected article, the author’s purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?  How will a closer analysis of the author’s claim and the structure of the writing help you learn more about your selected reading?  Now that you have discussed the author’s purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the author’s writing is effective in achieving their
purpose? What led you to this conclusion?
In total, the reflection should be three fully developed paragraphs in length. (Consider one paragraph per question, 5–8 sentences each.) As you work on the
journal, remember to refer to the rubric below to make sure you’re fulfilling the requirements for this assignment.
ol_125_milestone_one_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf

eng_122_importance_of_analysis_journal_guidelines_and_rubric.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

OL 125 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In this course, you will have many opportunities to take self-assessments that will allow you to reflect on yourself as a person, student, and
professional. This first milestone gives you an opportunity to reflect on your own strengths and opportunities for improvement as they pertain to leadership.
Prompt: For this milestone assignment, provide an initial self-reflection that discusses your own strengths as well as areas you feel you may need to improve.
Consider how these aspects of your personality and self-concept will allow you to improve your skills in a future leadership role.
This assignment will allow you to receive instructor feedback on your personality strengths and weaknesses that will be important in completing Milestone Two:
SWOT Analysis in Module Four and the final project in Module Seven.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
II.
Strengths: Discuss the aspects of your personality and self-concept that serve as a particular strength as you consider your future leadership
opportunities. Why are these important to you and to others you may be leading?
Areas of Improvement: Conversely, what aspects of your personality and self-concept may lead to difficulties in your future work as a leader? What areas
of improvement have you identified?
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your milestone assignment should 1 page in length. It should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch
margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Critical Elements
Personality and SelfConcept: Strengths
Exemplary
Personality and SelfConcept: Areas of
Improvement
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is
presented in a
professional and easy-toread format
(100%)
Proficient
Discusses aspects of
personality and selfconcept that serve as a
particular strength as
leadership opportunities
are considered
(100%)
Discusses aspects of
personality and selfconcept that are areas of
improvement and may
lead to difficulties in
future leadership
opportunities
(100%)
Submission has no major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization
(85%)
Needs Improvement
Discusses aspects of
personality and selfconcept that serve as a
particular strength as
leadership opportunities
are considered, but
discussion lacks clarity or
detail
(85%)
Discusses aspects of
personality and selfconcept that are areas of
improvement and may
lead to difficulties, but
discussion lacks clarity or
detail
(85%)
Submission has major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main ideas
(55%)
Not Evident
Does not discuss aspects
of personality and selfconcept that serve as a
particular strength
(0%)
Value
45
Does not discuss aspects
of personality and selfconcept that are areas of
improvement and may
lead to difficulties in
future leadership
opportunities
(0%)
Submission has critical
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent understanding
of ideas
(0%)
45
Total
10
100%
ENG 122 Importance of Analysis Journal Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: This journal is private between you and the instructor.
This week, you learned about active reading and analysis by looking more closely at a selected reading. In doing so, you uncovered ideas in the “Turning Off,
Dining In” article that may have been difficult to identify during your literal reading of the text.
To prepare for this assignment, please reread your selected article and your notes from Module One. Then, in a Microsoft Word document, answer the following
questions:



Discuss the context of your selected article, the author’s purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?
How will a closer analysis of the author’s claim and the structure of the writing help you learn more about your selected reading?
Now that you have discussed the author’s purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the author’s writing is effective in achieving their
purpose? What led you to this conclusion?
In total, the reflection should be three fully developed paragraphs in length. (Consider one paragraph per question, 5–8 sentences each.) As you work on the
journal, remember to refer to the rubric below to make sure you’re fulfilling the requirements for this assignment.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then,
check your writing for errors. Once you have proofread your document, submit it via the Journal: Importance of Analysis link in Brightspace.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Context of Selected
Article
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
Discusses the context of the
discusses the context of the
selected article and the author’s
selected article and the author’s purpose, style, and tone
purpose, style, and tone, and
provides specific, detailed
examples to illustrate analysis
Discusses the context of the
selected article and the author’s
purpose, style, and tone, but
response is unclear or cursory
Does not discuss the context of
the selected article and the
author’s purpose, style, and
tone
25
Analysis of Author’s
Claim
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
provides specific, detailed
examples to describe how an
analysis of the author’s claim
and structure of the writing will
help someone learn more about
the selected reading
Describes how an analysis of the
author’s claim and structure of
the writing will help someone
learn more about the selected
reading, but leaves gaps in
reasoning or clarity
Does not describe how an
analysis of the author’s claim
and structure of the writing will
help someone learn more about
the selected reading
25
Describes how an analysis of the
author’s claim and structure of
the writing will help someone
learn more about the selected
reading
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Author’s Effectiveness Meets “Proficient” criteria and
makes clear and specific
connections between author’s
writing choices and
effectiveness
Length
Articulation of
Response
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Explains current assessment of Explains current assessment of
author’s effectiveness and what author’s effectiveness and
led to this conclusion
explains what led to this
conclusion, but response leaves
gaps in reasoning or clarity
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Does not explain current
assessment of author’s
effectiveness
25
Writes three or more fully
developed paragraphs, with
exceptional detail, that directly
relate to the assignment prompt
Writes three developed
paragraphs (5–8 sentences each)
that directly relate to the
assignment prompt
Writes three paragraphs, but
Does not write three developed
content is not fully developed or paragraphs (5–8 sentences each)
does not directly relate to the
assignment prompt
15
Journal assignment is free of
errors in organization and
grammar
Journal assignment is mostly
free of errors of organization
and grammar; existing errors are
marginal and rarely interrupt the
flow
Journal assignment contains
errors of organization and
grammar, but they are limited
enough that assignments can be
understood
10
Journal assignment contains
errors of organization and
grammar that make the journal
difficult to understand
Total
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment