Select Page

1. To complete this assignment, use “You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students” and the guidelines for writing in the topic study materials. Write a 250-500-word summary of the article that includes paraphrases of the article, the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Reminder: This is an academic exercise that should not be written in first person. This is an APA paper that includes a separate title page with running head and a reference page. This is the article website: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=128789386&site=ehost-live&scope=site This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Rubric attached 2. Pick the industry health care. Using Google Scholar, the GCU Library, or another reputable site, identify industry-relevant scholarly sources that support the three pillars concepts: servant leadership, ethics, and entrepreneurism. Refer to the topic study materials to determine what is considered a scholarly resource. Create a title page and a references list that cites nine references from the past five years. Include at the following types of references: Five journal articles (include at least one article for each of the three pillars: servant leadership, ethics, and entrepreneurism)One bookOne websiteOne dissertation/thesis from a databaseOne book chapter Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
rubric_print_format.xlsx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Course Code
UNV-504
Class Code
UNV-504-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
60.0%
Summary of Article
30.0%
Research Problem, Questions, Method, Findings,
and Implications Discussed by the Authors
30.0%
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
40.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (e.g.,
sentence construction, word choice)
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
10.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
10.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Article Review
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Summary of the article is insufficient or not present.
Guidelines were not followed for writing as presented in the
topic study materials.
Summary does not present the research problem, questions,
method, findings, and/or implications discussed by the
authors.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Prose
indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or
uses them inappropriately.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
150.0
Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)
Summary of the article is unclearly written. Guidelines were
followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials,
but summary is incomplete or rudimentary.
Summary presents the research problem, questions, method,
findings, and implications, but explanation is insufficient or
rudimentary.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice
are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using
figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
Summary of the article is written clearly with paraphrases.
Guidelines were sufficiently followed for writing as presented
in the topic study materials.
Summary sufficiently presents the research problem,
questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by
the authors.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (87.00%)
Summary of the article is written clearly and academically
with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as
presented in the topic study materials in an academic
manner.
Summary presents the research problem, questions, method,
findings, and implications discussed by the authors in an
academic manner.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Summary of the article is written clearly, thoroughly, and
academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for
writing as presented in the topic study materials in an
academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid
understanding of academic writing.
Summary thoroughly presents the research problem,
questions, method, findings, and implications in an academic
manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of the
overall concept made by the author.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Comments
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment